| |
Advocate's Corner
|
|
| |
Transportation 2035: The Regional Transportation Plan Update
|
|
| |
Ever wonder what will the Bay Area be like in 25 years? The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) is not only wondering about our future—they are planning and budgeting it!
Currently, transportation planning agencies around the nine-county Bay Area are dreaming up ways to improve and change the way we will get around in the future. New tunnels, larger train networks, more ferries, road rehab, highway projects, new bike facilities and pedestrian accommodations are all on the table for consideration during the revision of MTC’s Regional Transportation Plan.
This process and document, known as the “RTP” or “T2035 Plan,” articulates a 25 year vision for getting around in the Bay Area. The RTP decides $100 BILLION+ in regional transportation investments and is one of the major opportunities the public has to shape how the Bay Area will grow and travel. This blueprint is revised every four years, and right now the T2035 Plan is underway. Goal-setting began in Summer 2007. Project wish-lists from the counties will be submitted in Fall 2007, and the plan and the budget will be approved in February 2009.
What does all this mean for bicyclists? Well, 4 years ago, BABC lobbied MTC (the regional transportation planning agency for the 9 counties of the Bay Area) to create a new account solely for the purpose of funding bike and pedestrian projects. And we succeeded: $200 million over 25 years was designated to flow through the “Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Program.” This money, $8 million a year, is meant to build out the Regional Bicycle Network and improve walking facilities around regional transit and business hubs.
That was a big improvement over the 2001 RTP, where no money at all was designated specifically for bikes and pedestrians. Yet the $8 million per year advance we made in the T2030 is not guaranteed to be included in the T2035 Plan. And even if it was, $8 million a year is not enough to build many projects for the entire Bay Area.
In fact, the projected “shortfall” (the amount we don’t have) to complete the Regional Bicycle Network is estimated to be around $965 million (2004 dollars). At $8 million a year, it will take us literally 120 million years to get a region with a coherent bicycle infrastructure!
So yes, $965 million is a lot of money. But compare it to a single proposed highway project in Marin: the current cost estimate to add one automobile lane in each direction to the 16-mile Sonoma-Marin Narrows is estimated at more than $800 million. The Bay Area could just about have a complete Regional Bicycle Network for that single highway project!
Given the current conundrums of climate change, increasing congestion, and epidemics obesity and diabetes, bicycling deserves to be on the forefront of our vision for a Bay Area we want to live in. For all of these reasons the Bay Area Bicycle Coalition will be working over the next year with the nine-county Bay Area bicycle coalitions to persuade MTC to up the ante on bicycle and pedestrian funding.
We urge the Metropolitan Transportation Commission to prioritize funding for this zero-emission, universally affordable, and healthy form of transportation. Certainly no other mode of travel accomplishes so much for so little.
Watch the BABC website for announcements for important updates on the 2009 RTP.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
Bay Area Bridge Bike Access
|
|
| |
What would it feel like to be riding across the Bay Bridge on
your bike? With a pathway beneath your wheels, and a view of
the Bay and the City skyline below, there is no better way to
cross the Bay.
Unfortunately, the reality is that the Bay Bridge prohibits
bicycles and pedestrians, so only those risking arrest know how
it feels to bike across the bridge. Three of the seven other
bridges in the Bay can also only be crossed by those using
motorized vehicles.
The Bay Area Bicycle Coalition is advocating for all of the Bay
Area bridges to be open to non-motorized traffic, as they are to
motorized traffic, 24 hours a day. Bike access plans have
already been found feasible for the West span of the Bay Bridge,
and the Richmond- San Rafael Bridge. We need your support for
funding the construction of pathways on the non-accessible
bridges.
Our goal is to secure direct access on all of the Bay Area’s
bridges. But in the meantime, access over the bridges can be
obtained by public transportation. You can locate a list of this
information at
http://www.bicycling.511.org/bridges.htm
Below is a list of the eight Bay Area Bridges, the current
status of bicycle access for each crossing, and whom you should
contact to support advocacy efforts relating to the bridges.
Golden Gate Bridge
Antioch Bridge
Dumbarton Bridge
San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
Carquinez Bridge
Benicia-Martinez Bridge
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge
San Mateo-Hayward Bridge
Southern Crossing over the Napa River on route 29 & 12
Petaluma River Bridge
|
|
| |
Golden Gate Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
The only Bay Area Bridge not owned by the state, the Golden Gate
Bridge falls under the jurisdiction of the Golden Gate Bridge,
Highway and Transportation District:
http://www.goldengate.org
While cyclists today can enjoy direct access, twenty-four hours
a day, to the Golden Gate Bridge, this availability has only
existed since November 23, 1992. When the bridge was opened in
1937, only pedestrians were allowed on the sidewalks.
Thirty-four years later, cyclists were granted access during
weekdays on the East sidewalk, and on the West during the
weekend. Efforts from bicycle advocates led to the November
1992 opening of the bridge to cyclists 24 hours a day. Check
out
http://www.goldengatebridge.org/bikesbridge/bikes.html for
an explanation of how to use the remotely controlled security
gates on the bridge after 9pm.
In November of 2003, an eleven-month installation process of a
public safety railing was completed on the bridge. The railing
protects the bike and pedestrian pathway from motor vehicle
traffic. While the Golden Gate Bridge is a huge tourist
attraction, it is also a major transportation route for
cyclists. With this heavy volume of non-motorized traffic, the
safety railing offers needed protection, yet also represents a
pathway receiving necessary attention. Even though the other
Bay Area bridges may not be as famous as the Golden Gate, they
should receive an equal amount of consideration for the safety
and convenience of non-motorized traffic- tourists and everyday
commuters alike.
Thanks to public comment over the past few years, the Golden
Gate Bridge, Highway and Transportation District’s proposal of a
$1 bicycle and pedestrian toll has not been enacted. But this
doesn’t rule out future attempts from the GGBHTD to gain money
through a bike/pedestrian toll.
|
|
| |
Antioch Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
The original structure was completed in January of 1926, and
then replaced in 1978; the new structure offering cyclists
access to both of the five-foot shoulders. Connecting State
Route 160 between Antioch in Contra Costa County, and Sherman
Island in Sacramento County, the Antioch Bridge provides
unlimited non-motorized access.
|
|
| |
Dumbarton Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
The original structure of this bridge was built in January of
1927, and then rebuilt in December of 1984 for safety and
traffic congestion reasons. This 1984 replacement span was
constructed with a bicycle and pedestrian pathway and is open 24
hours a day. The Dumbarton Bridge connects State Route 84
between San Mateo and Alameda Counties near Newark and East Palo
Alto.
|
|
| |
San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
No bicycle or pedestrian access on the West Span. Access on the
East Span is expected upon completion of the replacement bridge
(after 2010 at the earliest). For the latest info, go to the
SFBC’s Bay Bridge info page at
http://www.sfbike.org/?baybridge
While the new East Span structure of the Bay Bridge has been
designed to have a 15.5-foot-wide bicycle, pedestrian, and
maintenance pathway that will run along the eastbound deck, no
funding has been set aside for the West Span, or
bicycle/pedestrian access. The San Francisco Bicycle Coalition
has been working to gain support for funding of a pathway on the
West span that will enable non-motorized traffic to conveniently
cross the Bay between San Francisco and Oakland. Contact Andy
Thornley, Community Organizer of the San Francisco Bicycle
Coalition, to help support this project:
andy@sfbike.org or call him at 415-431-BIKE x307.
|
|
| |
Carquinez Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
Bicycle and pedestrian access from 6am-9pm only.
The new bike and pedestrian pathway on the Carquinez Bridge
opened on May 16, 2004. The 12-foot-wide path is located on the
western side of the suspension bridge connecting Solano and
Contra Costa counties along Interstate 80. The pathway, however,
was opened with a Dawn to Dusk regulation, and the bridge is not
accessible to non-motorized traffic after nightfall. This is
apparently due to terrorism concerns, even though truck traffic
continues to cross the span un-inspected. The East Bay Bicycle
Coalition is working to obtain 24-hour access to the pathway,
and is encouraging people to write the Governor's Cabinet head
of Caltrans. You can find out where to send your statement, as
well as view a sample letter at
www.ebbc.org
The EBBC suggests that you mention: The return on taxpayers’
investment in erecting the path is diminished when its hours of
use are limited.
|
|
| |
Benicia-Martinez Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
Currently no bicycle or pedestrian access, but will be available
Spring of 2007 when the new bridge opens.
The existing Benicia-Martinez Bridge provides Interstate 680
access across the Carquinez Strait between Contra Costa and
Solano counties. According to the Bay Area Toll Authority, a new
span that will carry five lanes of northbound traffic is being
built just east of and parallel to the existing span. The latter
will be converted to carry four lanes of southbound traffic as
well as a new bicycle and pedestrian pathway. As part of this
project, a new 17-booth toll plaza with two carpool bypass lanes
will be constructed in Contra Costa County.
While Caltrans calls for completion of the bridge in the Spring
of 2007, access for cyclists wanting to cross the bridge before
then is limited, especially now with the termination of the
Benicia-Martinez Bicycle shuttle. The Benicia bus lines are not
an adequate substitute for the bike shuttle because it
inconveniences those who are traveling to Martinez. The East
Bay Bicycle Coalition is working to reestablish the
Benicia-Martinez shuttle, as well as stressing the added need
for 24-hour access to the Carquinez Bridge if the shuttle
remains discontinued. Contact Robert Raburn, Executive Director
of the East Bay Bicycle Coalition to support these efforts:
robertraburn@ebbc.com
|
|
| |
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
No bicycle or pedestrian access.
Connecting Interstate 580 between Contra Costa and Marin
Counties, the 5.5 mile long bridge is not accessible to
bicyclists or pedestrians. Since its completion in 1956, the
Richmond San Rafael Bridge has been an important route for North
Bay travelers, but direct access has been denied to
non-motorized traffic. Bicycle advocates have struggled for the
past 50 years to obtain access on this bridge. Two Statewide
studies indicate direct access would be reasonably safe,
feasible, and affordable, but the twelve-foot shoulder remains
un-traveled. The Antioch Bridge, with only a five-foot
shoulder, is open to cyclists and pedestrians 24 hours a day.
The generous shoulder on the Richmond San Rafael Bridge would be
suitable for bicycle access with minor alterations, according to
a 2001 Caltrans study. For the latest news on bike access, go to the Marin County Bicycle Coalition (MCBC) website or contact Deb Hubsmith, MCBC Advocacy Director, to support current
actions for bridge access:
deb@marinbike.org or call at 415-454-7430.
|
|
| |
San Mateo-Hayward Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
No bicycle or pedestrian access.
Carrying State Route 92 between San Mateo and Alameda counties,
the San Mateo-Hayward Bridge does not provide access to
non-motorized traffic. The bridge was opened in October of 1967
and then widened in 2003 from four to six lanes of traffic, yet
a pathway was not added as part of this project. Public
transportation was, however, made more convenient to cyclists
this year with the AC transit Line M that carries up to six
bikes. While Line M was federally funded by a Congestion
Mitigation and Air Quality grant, and represents
bicycle-friendly improvements, providing unlimited non-motorized
direct access on the bridge is the only way to provide equal
access, not to mention reduce congestion and improve air
quality.
|
|
| |
Southern Crossing over the Napa River on route 29 & 12
|
To Top |
| |
Closed to cyclists. It is mentioned in the Napa County Bike Plan
as a potential project.
|
|
| |
Petaluma River Bridge
|
To Top |
| |
On Highway 37 at the Marin/Sonoma county line. Although open to
bikes there is no shoulder. Contact Lou Penning at
lpl@interx.net for more information on these and other Napa County Bike issues.
|
|
|